Slava Egorov
Slava Egorov
You would need to post a reproduction etc. Without code we could debug this is unactionable.
@leeflix The challenge I am having here is that we need a way to reproduce this. Without reproduction it is hard to say what and where exactly is going wrong....
@leeflix it's `SocketException` because it the low-level networking error, (web socket is just wrapping around lower level socket APIs). You get this sort of error if you have a client...
@aam I don't think the proposed change is enough. Rules around trailing dots apply to all path components, not just the trailing one. Consider path `test.\test.` for example. I think...
While stripping dots would be more _"Windows-native"_, I think we should opt for supporting dots in filepaths instead - because we are multiplatform language. We already hide some of the...
Lowering for Int32x4 lane accessors seems to be completely missing so we generate a native call for this with boxing. --- _Added [Area-VM](../labels/Area-VM), [Triaged](../labels/Triaged) labels._
I just checked and we are still missing inlining rules for `Int32x4` accessors.
To summarise some discussions we had between @mit-mit @lrhn and me. One of the approaches we could adopt now is to lean on environment constants more and change the code...
> You can define a closure using => without a leading parameter list. Why require `=>` and not something like: an expression containing `_` is lifted to become a closure...
Tests are not passing and there are still unresolved comments.