Mateusz Pusz
Mateusz Pusz
Right, I will think about this and take a closer look at LATeX (I was always scared of it :wink:).
> I see you added inline namespaces to resolve ambiguity. I think it's a bit unfortunate that all names have to get longer in the error messages due to a...
> What do you mean? It's still necessary. What should be removed are quantity_kind and quantity_point_kind. Yes, I agree. I already removed the others you mentioned. But now I have...
> it shouldn't be much, specially since it's simpler. Yes, but we also have abandoned #232. Maybe I should review this PR and apply some changes right away...
I have been staring at the new syntax for a few hours now, and I am not sure if I find it better. Here are some points: - for me...
I moved the entire `quantity_point` discussion to #414 as it was really hard to continue this thread here.
Thanks for reporting this bug. I am now on an extended vacation, but I will try to fix it when I find some time.
Yes, I know. I was able to reproduce it, and I know now what the problem is. I just did not have time to try to fix it, as I...
Yes, on the one hand, this is precisely what we want. On the other hand, this makes the code not portable.
Thanks for reporting! Right now, I literally have no time to work on units (both the mainline and the V2 branch). I will try to look into this issue soon.