Mateusz Pusz
Mateusz Pusz
> What's stopping you from doing just that? Lack of time 😉 I didn't work on it too much yet but hopefully I will start soon. I like your suggestions...
I think that "m½" is self-explanatory and we might not need additional "^" sign but we can decide otherwise. Here is the info how to create any ratio: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_subscripts_and_superscripts.
>So you are suggesting, we abandon the idea of the these actually being exponents/superscripts? and just write (effectively) "m * 1/2"? No. If we are about to stay with ASCII...
There are ony a few physical quantities that really use them. I was provided one of them some time ago but I lost it and do not remember the name...
Well, we can always cheat: https://stackoverflow.com/a/49325148 ;-)
For such cases consider introducing `CONSTEVAL` in `hacks.h`.
Both of the overloads are valid. From **mp-units** point of view `std::experimental::math::vector` storing `long double` is just a `Scalar` (not a quantity) and every quantity can be multiplied by the...
Term "Scalar" definition depends on a domain. In maths it is the description you provided and this is the one used by the LA. In Physical Units domain a Scalar...
> We could argue what Scalar means but it doesnt solve your problem ;) Agree, if you have a better name for the "Scalar" term in a physical units domain...
I think I do not fully agree here. > since this is not how matrices work with quantities. There is more than one way to do it. I think that...