Mike Pilgrem

On copyright and licensing, I have added something concrete to facilitate discussion. The addition does not conflict with @Bodigrim's understanding, but perhaps the existing acknowledgements are incomplete. EDIT: I've added...

@simonpj, that is what this pull request is intended to do: it separates out what is 'generic' from its Haskell Foundation-specific context, enabling other people/bodies to reference the former and...

@simonpj, on copyright and wording, the members of the GHC Steering Committee could do what I did in this pull request to 'push it further back down the chain'. That...

@tomjaguarpaw, you can build with `process-1.6.20.0` but that is a different build plan than the one promised by a snapshot that specifies GHC 9.10.1 and (by implication) the boot packages...

It is a little complicated. If you specify a GHC boot package as an extra-dep then you have to specify also any boot package dependencies as an extra-dep. If you...

@tomjaguarpaw, it is - many thanks!

To clarify, my final suggestion on what the Foundation 'avoids' is not an _addition_ but an amendment. The [existing guidance](https://haskell.foundation/guidelines-for-respectful-communication/) has: * Where we disagree with someone, we avoid forms...

EDIT3: When I commented below, I was unaware of: * #481. @hasufell's purpose can be understood by reference to #481. -oOo- The purpose reflected by @hasufell's most recent suggested edits...

The CI fails with GHC 8.2.2. However: (a) I think that is for reasons unrelated to this pull request and (b) GHC 8.2.2, released on 22 July 2017, is considered...

The CI for Linux/GHC 9.12.20241014 is failing for reasons unrelated to this pull request.