web-ext
web-ext copied to clipboard
A command line tool to help build, run, and test web extensions
Investigate "nyc"-related failure while running test-coverage npm script on travis windows workers
In some recent Pull Requests, the travis CI job running on windows is failing with the following error message: ``` Running mocha unit tests... ----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|-------------------| File | % Stmts |...
### Is this a feature request or a bug? Feature Request ### What is the current behavior? `web-ext build` ignores files based on a hard-coded default list and whatever you...
### Is this a feature request or a bug? Bug ### What is the current behavior? The 'sign' command includes the web-ext-artifacts folder when packaging the extension. ### What is...
### Is this a feature request or a bug? Bug (moving from [bug 1524679](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1524679)). ### What is the current behavior? When using a profile with a language pack installed and...
### Is this a feature request or a bug? Feature request ### What is the current behavior? The tests are slow. ### What is the expected or desired behavior? The...
### Is this a feature request or a bug? you choose ### What is the current behavior? we need to sign 20+ extension build variants for different brands and configurations....
As a first step to understanding what the test command should do (https://github.com/mozilla/web-ext/issues/5), let's try and add tests to the [web extension examples](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Examples). Things to try: - See how far...
I'm unable to run the command on both Android 6.0.1 and 7.0. In both cases the CLI tool returns ``` > web-ext run --target=firefox-android --android-device=MWS021680000XXXX Running web extension from /Users/alby/Sites/external-video-player-addon...
### Is this a feature request or a bug? Feature request ### What is the current behavior? Currently, `web-ext run` helpfully reloads the extension on file changes, but it doesn't...
Currently we are adding optional parameters to many of the internal functions just to be able to mock those "dependencies" for testing purpose, it would be better if we could...