neqo icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
neqo copied to clipboard
verified publisher icon mozilla

feat(transport/cc): lower CWND reduction on ECN CE vs loss

Open mxinden opened this issue 1 month ago • 5 comments

Work in progress.

Fixes https://github.com/mozilla/neqo/issues/3111.

mxinden avatar Nov 06 '25 23:11 mxinden

Failed Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server, differences relative to 6d56ec96fc97b488b0d67df1e72807386fdb23dd.

neqo-latest as client

neqo-latest as server

All results

Succeeded Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-latest as client

neqo-latest as server

Unsupported Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-latest as client

neqo-latest as server

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 07 '25 00:11 github-actions[bot]

Client/server transfer results

Performance differences relative to 207d309e941d3ae9384c191c13463dc81fca4ce9.

Transfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback, min. 100 runs. All unit-less numbers are in milliseconds.

Client vs. server (params) Mean ± σ Min Max MiB/s ± σ Δ main Δ main
google vs. google 455.1 ± 3.5 449.6 466.8 70.3 ± 9.1
google vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 277.2 ± 3.7 271.7 284.2 115.5 ± 8.6 -0.5 -0.2%
msquic vs. msquic 204.7 ± 72.8 143.6 439.6 156.3 ± 0.4
msquic vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 218.7 ± 69.4 153.0 495.1 146.3 ± 0.5 4.3 2.0%
neqo vs. google (cubic, paced) 758.8 ± 4.9 750.9 777.5 42.2 ± 6.5 -0.2 -0.0%
neqo vs. msquic (cubic, paced) 157.7 ± 5.3 150.8 172.4 202.9 ± 6.0 0.9 0.6%
neqo vs. neqo (cubic) 94.4 ± 4.9 85.5 108.7 339.0 ± 6.5 -0.0 -0.1%
neqo vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 93.7 ± 4.0 88.1 104.5 341.7 ± 8.0 :green_heart: -2.1 -2.2%
neqo vs. neqo (reno) 95.5 ± 4.0 85.6 103.1 335.0 ± 8.0 0.3 0.3%
neqo vs. neqo (reno, paced) 94.6 ± 4.2 87.8 104.4 338.3 ± 7.6 -0.1 -0.1%
neqo vs. quiche (cubic, paced) 193.6 ± 4.6 186.6 207.3 165.3 ± 7.0 :broken_heart: 2.4 1.2%
neqo vs. s2n (cubic, paced) 224.2 ± 4.3 214.8 238.1 142.7 ± 7.4 :broken_heart: 2.7 1.2%
quiche vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 150.8 ± 5.5 141.4 179.5 212.1 ± 5.8 -0.8 -0.6%
quiche vs. quiche 146.3 ± 5.3 136.8 162.3 218.7 ± 6.0
s2n vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 172.6 ± 4.8 164.2 182.5 185.4 ± 6.7 1.2 0.7%
s2n vs. s2n 251.2 ± 30.8 231.8 350.0 127.4 ± 1.0

Download data for profiler.firefox.com or download performance comparison data.

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 07 '25 00:11 github-actions[bot]

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchecn-ce-reaction
TestbedOn-prem

🚨 1 Alert

IterationBenchmarkMeasure
Units		ViewBenchmark Result
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
(Limit %)
9neqo vs. s2n (cubic, paced)Latency
milliseconds (ms)		📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)		224.22 ms
(+1.41%)Baseline: 221.11 ms
224.11 ms
(100.05%)

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
google vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		277.16 ms
(-0.32%)Baseline: 278.06 ms
281.94 ms
(98.30%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
msquic vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		218.70 ms
(+10.49%)Baseline: 197.93 ms
235.21 ms
(92.98%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. google (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		758.81 ms
(+0.04%)Baseline: 758.55 ms
770.35 ms
(98.50%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. msquic (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		157.73 ms
(-0.07%)Baseline: 157.84 ms
160.77 ms
(98.11%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (cubic)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		94.39 ms
(+3.44%)Baseline: 91.25 ms
96.41 ms
(97.91%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		93.65 ms
(+1.08%)Baseline: 92.66 ms
97.84 ms
(95.72%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (reno)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		95.53 ms
(+4.61%)Baseline: 91.32 ms
96.51 ms
(98.99%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (reno, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		94.58 ms
(+2.22%)Baseline: 92.52 ms
97.44 ms
(97.07%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. quiche (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		193.55 ms
(-0.06%)Baseline: 193.67 ms
197.03 ms
(98.24%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. s2n (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)		224.22 ms
(+1.41%)Baseline: 221.11 ms
224.11 ms
(100.05%)

BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
quiche vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		150.84 ms
(-1.40%)Baseline: 152.99 ms
158.15 ms
(95.38%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
s2n vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		172.59 ms
(-0.80%)Baseline: 173.97 ms
178.08 ms
(96.92%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 07 '25 00:11 github-actions[bot]

Benchmark results

Performance differences relative to 207d309e941d3ae9384c191c13463dc81fca4ce9.

1-conn/1-100mb-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. Download)/client: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [197.90 ms 198.31 ms 198.80 ms]
       thrpt:  [503.03 MiB/s 504.27 MiB/s 505.31 MiB/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.3444% −0.0576% +0.2452%] (p = 0.70 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [−0.2446% +0.0577% +0.3455%]

Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. RPS)/client: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [288.62 ms 290.19 ms 291.77 ms]
       thrpt:  [34.273 Kelem/s 34.460 Kelem/s 34.647 Kelem/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.4508% +0.3077% +1.1011%] (p = 0.44 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [−1.0891% −0.3067% +0.4528%]

Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
1 (1.00%) high mild
1-conn/1-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. HPS)/client: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [38.561 ms 38.757 ms 38.971 ms]
       thrpt:  [25.660   B/s 25.802   B/s 25.933   B/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.7217% +0.0092% +0.7923%] (p = 0.98 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [−0.7861% −0.0092% +0.7270%]

Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
10 (10.00%) high severe
1-conn/1-100mb-req/mtu-1504 (aka. Upload)/client: :green_heart: Performance has improved.
       time:   [201.73 ms 202.07 ms 202.48 ms]
       thrpt:  [493.87 MiB/s 494.88 MiB/s 495.70 MiB/s]
change:
       time:   [−2.0123% −1.7715% −1.5155%] (p = 0.00 +1.8035% +2.0536%]

Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
decode 4096 bytes, mask ff: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [10.733 µs 10.773 µs 10.819 µs]
       change: [−1.0345% −0.3273% +0.3296%] (p = 0.36 > 0.05)

Found 15 outliers among 100 measurements (15.00%)
1 (1.00%) low severe
4 (4.00%) low mild
1 (1.00%) high mild
9 (9.00%) high severe
decode 1048576 bytes, mask ff: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [3.0247 ms 3.0378 ms 3.0544 ms]
       change: [−0.3628% +0.1811% +0.8139%] (p = 0.56 > 0.05)

Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%)
9 (9.00%) high severe
decode 4096 bytes, mask 7f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [19.345 µs 19.393 µs 19.447 µs]
       change: [−0.3736% +0.0620% +0.5324%] (p = 0.80 > 0.05)

Found 16 outliers among 100 measurements (16.00%)
2 (2.00%) low severe
2 (2.00%) low mild
12 (12.00%) high severe
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 7f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [5.0542 ms 5.0810 ms 5.1203 ms]
       change: [−0.1648% +0.4352% +1.2721%] (p = 0.26 > 0.05)

Found 17 outliers among 100 measurements (17.00%)
17 (17.00%) high severe
decode 4096 bytes, mask 3f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [5.5436 µs 5.5911 µs 5.6493 µs]
       change: [−0.2756% +0.4599% +1.1684%] (p = 0.24 > 0.05)

Found 14 outliers among 100 measurements (14.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
2 (2.00%) high mild
11 (11.00%) high severe
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 3f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [1.5867 ms 1.5923 ms 1.5993 ms]
       change: [−0.4410% +0.1023% +0.6410%] (p = 0.69 > 0.05)

Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
6 (6.00%) high severe
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [585.68 µs 586.90 µs 588.48 µs]
       change: [−0.5799% −0.1201% +0.2709%] (p = 0.62 > 0.05)

Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%)
2 (2.00%) low mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time
time:   [118.85 ms 119.07 ms 119.29 ms]
thrpt:  [8.1864 KiB/s 8.2016 KiB/s 8.2165 KiB/s]
change:
time:   [−0.2130% +0.0546% +0.3135%] (p = 0.67 > 0.05)
thrpt:  [−0.3126% −0.0546% +0.2134%]
No change in performance detected.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/wallclock-time: :broken_heart: Performance has regressed.
       time:   [12.771 ms 12.806 ms 12.841 ms]
       change: [+1.4376% +1.8690% +2.3111%] (p = 0.00
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/simulated-time: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [2.3328 s 2.3359 s 2.3390 s]
       thrpt:  [427.53   B/s 428.10   B/s 428.67   B/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.0939% +0.1135% +0.3278%] (p = 0.31 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [−0.3267% −0.1134% +0.0940%]
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time: :broken_heart: Performance has regressed.
       time:   [51.525 ms 51.646 ms 51.768 ms]
       change: [+1.4391% +1.7474% +2.0508%] (p = 0.00 Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
1 (1.00%) high mild
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time
time:   [14.916 s 15.138 s 15.363 s]
thrpt:  [63.567 KiB/s 64.509 KiB/s 65.469 KiB/s]
change:
time:   [−10.896% −8.8469% −6.8007%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
thrpt:  [+7.2970% +9.7055% +12.228%]
:green_heart: Performance has improved.
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [89.192 ns 89.508 ns 89.819 ns]
       change: [−1.4437% −0.6121% +0.0339%] (p = 0.10 > 0.05)

Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
5 (5.00%) high mild
3 (3.00%) high severe
coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [106.17 ns 106.47 ns 106.79 ns]
       change: [−0.8803% −0.3134% +0.1654%] (p = 0.25 > 0.05)

Found 17 outliers among 100 measurements (17.00%)
1 (1.00%) low severe
3 (3.00%) low mild
7 (7.00%) high mild
6 (6.00%) high severe
coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [105.59 ns 106.04 ns 106.57 ns]
       change: [−0.1208% +0.4748% +1.1290%] (p = 0.14 > 0.05)

Found 15 outliers among 100 measurements (15.00%)
5 (5.00%) low mild
2 (2.00%) high mild
8 (8.00%) high severe
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [91.253 ns 91.362 ns 91.490 ns]
       change: [−0.7651% −0.2285% +0.2941%] (p = 0.41 > 0.05)

Found 16 outliers among 100 measurements (16.00%)
4 (4.00%) high mild
12 (12.00%) high severe
RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame(): Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [109.32 ms 109.49 ms 109.76 ms]
       change: [−0.8650% −0.6832% −0.3943%] (p = 0.00 Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
8 (8.00%) low mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
sent::Packets::take_ranges: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [4.3933 µs 4.4903 µs 4.5814 µs]
       change: [−5.5898% −2.4415% +1.0656%] (p = 0.15 > 0.05)

Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [24.691 ms 24.739 ms 24.790 ms]
       change: [−0.9390% −0.6689% −0.4001%] (p = 0.00 Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
1 (1.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [25.194 s 25.226 s 25.259 s]
       thrpt:  [162.16 KiB/s 162.37 KiB/s 162.58 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.0657% +0.1138% +0.3064%] (p = 0.24 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [−0.3055% −0.1136% +0.0657%]

Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [25.719 ms 25.769 ms 25.819 ms]
       change: [+0.6851% +1.0382% +1.3704%] (p = 0.00 Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [24.788 s 24.824 s 24.861 s]
       thrpt:  [164.76 KiB/s 165.00 KiB/s 165.24 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [−1.0559% −0.8336% −0.6281%] (p = 0.00 +0.8406% +1.0671%]
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [24.858 ms 24.884 ms 24.916 ms]
       change: [+1.2697% +1.4133% +1.5749%] (p = 0.00 Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/simulated-time/run: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [25.234 s 25.234 s 25.234 s]
       thrpt:  [162.32 KiB/s 162.32 KiB/s 162.32 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [+0.0000% +0.0000% +0.0000%] (p = NaN > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [+0.0000% +0.0000% +0.0000%]
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [26.292 ms 26.326 ms 26.374 ms]
       change: [−0.8637% −0.7236% −0.5429%] (p = 0.00 Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/simulated-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [25.254 s 25.254 s 25.254 s]
       thrpt:  [162.19 KiB/s 162.19 KiB/s 162.19 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.1823% −0.1823% −0.1823%] (p = 0.00 +0.1827% +0.1827%]

Download data for profiler.firefox.com or download performance comparison data.

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 07 '25 00:11 github-actions[bot]

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchecn-ce-reaction
TestbedOn-prem

🚨 1 Alert

BenchmarkMeasure
Units		ViewBenchmark Result
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
(Limit %)
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/simulated-time/runLatency
seconds (s)		📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)		25.23 s
(+0.21%)Baseline: 25.17 s
25.22 s
(100.02%)

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
nanoseconds (ns)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
1-conn/1-100mb-req/mtu-1504 (aka. Upload)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		202,070,000.00 ns
(-2.34%)Baseline: 206,904,153.35 ns
216,801,155.68 ns
(93.21%)
1-conn/1-100mb-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. Download)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		198,310,000.00 ns
(-1.32%)Baseline: 200,959,297.12 ns
211,660,162.93 ns
(93.69%)
1-conn/1-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. HPS)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		38,757,000.00 ns
(+25.28%)Baseline: 30,935,504.79 ns
41,369,058.31 ns
(93.69%)
1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. RPS)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		290,190,000.00 ns
(-0.50%)Baseline: 291,658,306.71 ns
304,189,804.54 ns
(95.40%)
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		119,070,000.00 ns
(+0.37%)Baseline: 118,635,047.92 ns
120,751,498.91 ns
(98.61%)
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		586,900.00 ns
(-1.07%)Baseline: 593,275.91 ns
616,667.41 ns
(95.17%)
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		2,335,900,000.00 ns
(-84.04%)Baseline: 14,631,772,843.45 ns
19,580,063,385.77 ns
(11.93%)
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		12,806,000.00 ns
(-8.18%)Baseline: 13,947,313.10 ns
14,967,389.73 ns
(85.56%)
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		15,138,000,000.00 ns
(-19.85%)Baseline: 18,887,000,000.00 ns
19,984,377,245.14 ns
(75.75%)
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		51,646,000.00 ns
(+2.00%)Baseline: 50,633,900.96 ns
57,342,790.67 ns
(90.07%)
RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame()📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		109,490,000.00 ns
(-0.18%)Baseline: 109,692,907.35 ns
111,642,666.18 ns
(98.07%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		89.51 ns
(+0.82%)Baseline: 88.78 ns
89.88 ns
(99.59%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		106.04 ns
(-0.01%)Baseline: 106.05 ns
107.15 ns
(98.96%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		91.36 ns
(+1.39%)Baseline: 90.11 ns
94.58 ns
(96.60%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		106.47 ns
(-0.09%)Baseline: 106.56 ns
107.61 ns
(98.94%)
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 3f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		1,592,300.00 ns
(-2.04%)Baseline: 1,625,532.91 ns
1,785,839.32 ns
(89.16%)
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 7f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		5,081,000.00 ns
(+0.31%)Baseline: 5,065,317.89 ns
5,110,024.98 ns
(99.43%)
decode 1048576 bytes, mask ff📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		3,037,800.00 ns
(+0.28%)Baseline: 3,029,216.29 ns
3,047,001.99 ns
(99.70%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask 3f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		5,591.10 ns
(-24.18%)Baseline: 7,374.61 ns
10,407.17 ns
(53.72%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask 7f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		19,393.00 ns
(-2.08%)Baseline: 19,804.79 ns
20,474.78 ns
(94.72%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask ff📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		10,773.00 ns
(-5.19%)Baseline: 11,362.27 ns
12,549.26 ns
(85.85%)
sent::Packets::take_ranges📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		4,490.30 ns
(-5.02%)Baseline: 4,727.68 ns
4,965.51 ns
(90.43%)
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		25,234,000,000.00 ns
(-0.76%)Baseline: 25,428,331,189.71 ns
26,063,680,149.37 ns
(96.82%)
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		24,884,000.00 ns
(-3.45%)Baseline: 25,772,376.21 ns
27,088,343.66 ns
(91.86%)
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)		25,226,000,000.00 ns
(+0.21%)Baseline: 25,173,643,086.82 ns
25,221,994,030.43 ns
(100.02%)

transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		24,739,000.00 ns
(-4.23%)Baseline: 25,831,672.03 ns
27,473,592.18 ns
(90.05%)
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		25,254,000,000.00 ns
(-1.37%)Baseline: 25,605,781,350.48 ns
25,844,084,982.26 ns
(97.72%)
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		26,326,000.00 ns
(-2.85%)Baseline: 27,098,450.16 ns
28,642,091.89 ns
(91.91%)
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		24,824,000,000.00 ns
(-0.68%)Baseline: 24,993,520,900.32 ns
25,046,383,089.07 ns
(99.11%)
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		25,769,000.00 ns
(-2.15%)Baseline: 26,334,472.67 ns
28,061,333.28 ns
(91.83%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 07 '25 00:11 github-actions[bot]

@omansfeld finished this in https://github.com/mozilla/neqo/pull/3233. :pray:

mxinden avatar Dec 17 '25 15:12 mxinden