neqo icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
neqo copied to clipboard
verified publisher icon mozilla

chore: `[email protected]`

Open larseggert opened this issue 2 months ago • 7 comments

larseggert avatar Nov 05 '25 17:11 larseggert

Codecov Report

:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 93.40%. Comparing base (1fea5ea) to head (12ce246). :warning: Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3110      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.41%   93.40%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         124      124              
  Lines       36178    36178              
  Branches    36178    36178              
==========================================
- Hits        33796    33791       -5     
- Misses       1536     1539       +3     
- Partials      846      848       +2
Components Coverage Δ
neqo-common 97.32% <ø> (ø)
neqo-crypto 83.25% <ø> (-0.48%) :arrow_down:
neqo-http3 93.34% <ø> (ø)
neqo-qpack 94.18% <ø> (ø)
neqo-transport 94.50% <ø> (+0.03%) :arrow_up:
neqo-udp 78.94% <ø> (-0.48%) :arrow_down:
mtu 85.76% <ø> (ø)

codecov[bot] avatar Nov 05 '25 17:11 codecov[bot]

Failed Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server, differences relative to d4d877ae225bf10b221a94ac15d024bb20356d9a.

neqo-latest as client

neqo-latest as server

All results

Succeeded Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-latest as client

neqo-latest as server

Unsupported Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-latest as client

neqo-latest as server

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 05 '25 17:11 github-actions[bot]

Client/server transfer results

Performance differences relative to 6d56ec96fc97b488b0d67df1e72807386fdb23dd.

Transfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback, min. 100 runs. All unit-less numbers are in milliseconds.

Client vs. server (params) Mean ± σ Min Max MiB/s ± σ Δ main Δ main
google vs. google 465.4 ± 4.7 456.1 475.9 68.8 ± 6.8
google vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 282.9 ± 4.9 273.1 302.6 113.1 ± 6.5 :broken_heart: 1.7 0.6%
msquic vs. msquic 180.2 ± 53.8 137.2 394.0 177.5 ± 0.6
msquic vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 199.2 ± 56.0 149.2 412.3 160.7 ± 0.6 -9.6 -4.6%
neqo vs. google (cubic, paced) 769.3 ± 4.7 761.8 784.4 41.6 ± 6.8 -0.6 -0.1%
neqo vs. msquic (cubic, paced) 158.0 ± 6.1 148.7 190.3 202.5 ± 5.2 0.6 0.4%
neqo vs. neqo (cubic) 95.7 ± 6.0 86.7 112.4 334.5 ± 5.3 :broken_heart: 1.5 1.6%
neqo vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 96.7 ± 5.7 86.5 126.7 330.8 ± 5.6 0.7 0.7%
neqo vs. neqo (reno) 93.0 ± 4.6 86.6 109.6 344.3 ± 7.0 :green_heart: -1.9 -2.0%
neqo vs. neqo (reno, paced) 94.7 ± 5.7 84.3 113.2 337.9 ± 5.6 0.5 0.6%
neqo vs. quiche (cubic, paced) 192.7 ± 4.6 186.0 204.7 166.0 ± 7.0 -0.2 -0.1%
neqo vs. s2n (cubic, paced) 221.6 ± 4.5 214.4 232.2 144.4 ± 7.1 :green_heart: -1.3 -0.6%
quiche vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 152.6 ± 4.9 141.9 164.7 209.7 ± 6.5 -0.5 -0.4%
quiche vs. quiche 143.8 ± 4.7 135.7 154.1 222.5 ± 6.8
s2n vs. neqo (cubic, paced) 172.5 ± 5.3 164.5 183.7 185.5 ± 6.0 -0.2 -0.1%
s2n vs. s2n 246.9 ± 23.8 233.2 344.7 129.6 ± 1.3

Download data for profiler.firefox.com or download performance comparison data.

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 05 '25 17:11 github-actions[bot]

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchchore-idna-adapter
TestbedOn-prem

🚨 1 Alert

IterationBenchmarkMeasure
Units		ViewBenchmark Result
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
(Limit %)
0google vs. neqo (cubic, paced)Latency
milliseconds (ms)		📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)		282.87 ms
(+1.73%)Baseline: 278.05 ms
281.91 ms
(100.34%)

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
google vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)		282.87 ms
(+1.73%)Baseline: 278.05 ms
281.91 ms
(100.34%)

BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
msquic vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		199.16 ms
(+0.83%)Baseline: 197.52 ms
234.44 ms
(84.95%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. google (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		769.35 ms
(+1.44%)Baseline: 758.42 ms
769.71 ms
(99.95%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. msquic (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		158.00 ms
(+0.10%)Baseline: 157.84 ms
160.80 ms
(98.26%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (cubic)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		95.66 ms
(+4.90%)Baseline: 91.19 ms
96.30 ms
(99.33%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		96.73 ms
(+4.46%)Baseline: 92.60 ms
97.74 ms
(98.97%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (reno)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		92.95 ms
(+1.86%)Baseline: 91.25 ms
96.35 ms
(96.48%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. neqo (reno, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		94.70 ms
(+2.39%)Baseline: 92.49 ms
97.42 ms
(97.22%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. quiche (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		192.74 ms
(-0.49%)Baseline: 193.68 ms
197.06 ms
(97.81%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
neqo vs. s2n (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		221.62 ms
(+0.24%)Baseline: 221.08 ms
224.05 ms
(98.91%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
quiche vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		152.60 ms
(-0.27%)Baseline: 153.02 ms
158.21 ms
(96.46%)
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
s2n vs. neqo (cubic, paced)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		172.53 ms
(-0.86%)Baseline: 174.02 ms
178.09 ms
(96.88%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 05 '25 17:11 github-actions[bot]

Benchmark results

Performance differences relative to 6d56ec96fc97b488b0d67df1e72807386fdb23dd.

1-conn/1-100mb-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. Download)/client: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [198.26 ms 198.70 ms 199.20 ms]
       thrpt:  [502.02 MiB/s 503.27 MiB/s 504.40 MiB/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.5666% −0.2490% +0.0624%] (p = 0.12 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [−0.0623% +0.2496% +0.5698%]

Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high severe
1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. RPS)/client: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [286.73 ms 288.45 ms 290.16 ms]
       thrpt:  [34.464 Kelem/s 34.669 Kelem/s 34.875 Kelem/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.3945% +0.4242% +1.2712%] (p = 0.33 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [−1.2552% −0.4224% +0.3961%]

Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
1 (1.00%) high mild
1-conn/1-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. HPS)/client: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [38.554 ms 38.695 ms 38.853 ms]
       thrpt:  [25.738   B/s 25.843   B/s 25.938   B/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.0981% +0.3542% +0.8346%] (p = 0.16 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [−0.8277% −0.3529% +0.0982%]

Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
4 (4.00%) high severe
1-conn/1-100mb-req/mtu-1504 (aka. Upload)/client: :green_heart: Performance has improved.
       time:   [202.02 ms 202.41 ms 202.95 ms]
       thrpt:  [492.74 MiB/s 494.05 MiB/s 495.00 MiB/s]
change:
       time:   [−2.2754% −2.0079% −1.6908%] (p = 0.00 +2.0491% +2.3284%]

Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
2 (2.00%) high severe
decode 4096 bytes, mask ff: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [10.627 µs 10.686 µs 10.763 µs]
       change: [−1.5109% −0.8882% −0.2210%] (p = 0.00 Found 14 outliers among 100 measurements (14.00%)
4 (4.00%) low mild
1 (1.00%) high mild
9 (9.00%) high severe
decode 1048576 bytes, mask ff: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [3.0188 ms 3.0282 ms 3.0393 ms]
       change: [−0.7383% −0.2486% +0.2532%] (p = 0.32 > 0.05)

Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
8 (8.00%) high severe
decode 4096 bytes, mask 7f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [19.372 µs 19.424 µs 19.482 µs]
       change: [−0.2409% +0.4109% +1.1385%] (p = 0.29 > 0.05)

Found 19 outliers among 100 measurements (19.00%)
2 (2.00%) low mild
1 (1.00%) high mild
16 (16.00%) high severe
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 7f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [5.0352 ms 5.0487 ms 5.0653 ms]
       change: [−0.5213% −0.1110% +0.3107%] (p = 0.60 > 0.05)

Found 13 outliers among 100 measurements (13.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
12 (12.00%) high severe
decode 4096 bytes, mask 3f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [5.5189 µs 5.5356 µs 5.5584 µs]
       change: [−0.3866% +0.1298% +0.6491%] (p = 0.65 > 0.05)

Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
4 (4.00%) high mild
4 (4.00%) high severe
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 3f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [1.5850 ms 1.5905 ms 1.5974 ms]
       change: [−0.7684% −0.1618% +0.4128%] (p = 0.59 > 0.05)

Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%)
5 (5.00%) high severe
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [582.78 µs 584.91 µs 587.35 µs]
       change: [−0.6215% +0.1755% +0.9061%] (p = 0.68 > 0.05)

Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
8 (8.00%) high severe
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time
time:   [118.93 ms 119.14 ms 119.35 ms]
thrpt:  [8.1821 KiB/s 8.1967 KiB/s 8.2111 KiB/s]
change:
time:   [−0.0664% +0.1851% +0.4407%] (p = 0.15 > 0.05)
thrpt:  [−0.4388% −0.1848% +0.0664%]
No change in performance detected.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/wallclock-time: :broken_heart: Performance has regressed.
       time:   [13.560 ms 13.584 ms 13.609 ms]
       change: [+7.3122% +7.7434% +8.1654%] (p = 0.00
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/simulated-time: :broken_heart: Performance has regressed.
       time:   [15.031 s 15.045 s 15.060 s]
       thrpt:  [66.403   B/s 66.466   B/s 66.530   B/s]
change:
       time:   [+543.98% +545.12% +546.25%] (p = 0.00 −84.499% −84.471%]
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time: :green_heart: Performance has improved.
       time:   [47.419 ms 47.594 ms 47.777 ms]
       change: [−6.8004% −6.3796% −5.9997%] (p = 0.00 Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time
time:   [18.777 s 18.942 s 19.106 s]
thrpt:  [51.112 KiB/s 51.556 KiB/s 52.008 KiB/s]
change:
time:   [+14.367% +16.460% +18.561%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
thrpt:  [−15.655% −14.134% −12.562%]
:broken_heart: Performance has regressed.
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [89.166 ns 89.516 ns 89.864 ns]
       change: [−0.7243% −0.2205% +0.3057%] (p = 0.40 > 0.05)

Found 12 outliers among 100 measurements (12.00%)
9 (9.00%) high mild
3 (3.00%) high severe
coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [106.03 ns 106.89 ns 108.22 ns]
       change: [−1.1724% −0.5084% +0.1893%] (p = 0.16 > 0.05)

Found 15 outliers among 100 measurements (15.00%)
2 (2.00%) low mild
3 (3.00%) high mild
10 (10.00%) high severe
coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [105.40 ns 105.88 ns 106.41 ns]
       change: [−0.7398% −0.3441% +0.0266%] (p = 0.08 > 0.05)

Found 13 outliers among 100 measurements (13.00%)
5 (5.00%) low severe
2 (2.00%) low mild
6 (6.00%) high severe
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [91.431 ns 91.557 ns 91.697 ns]
       change: [−0.2931% +0.4326% +1.0994%] (p = 0.23 > 0.05)

Found 13 outliers among 100 measurements (13.00%)
6 (6.00%) high mild
7 (7.00%) high severe
RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame(): Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [109.52 ms 109.58 ms 109.66 ms]
       change: [−0.5339% −0.2481% −0.0414%] (p = 0.04 Found 12 outliers among 100 measurements (12.00%)
7 (7.00%) low mild
3 (3.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
sent::Packets::take_ranges: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [4.4962 µs 4.5978 µs 4.6908 µs]
       change: [−8.4237% −3.3744% +1.0814%] (p = 0.19 > 0.05)

Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [24.719 ms 24.766 ms 24.821 ms]
       change: [−1.9817% −1.6659% −1.3717%] (p = 0.00 Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [25.135 s 25.167 s 25.198 s]
       thrpt:  [162.55 KiB/s 162.76 KiB/s 162.96 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.3585% −0.1694% +0.0121%] (p = 0.08 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [−0.0121% +0.1697% +0.3598%]
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [25.180 ms 25.259 ms 25.345 ms]
       change: [−2.9904% −2.6082% −2.2034%] (p = 0.00 Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [24.941 s 24.979 s 25.019 s]
       thrpt:  [163.71 KiB/s 163.98 KiB/s 164.23 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.2644% −0.0329% +0.1985%] (p = 0.78 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [−0.1981% +0.0329% +0.2651%]

Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [24.655 ms 24.685 ms 24.723 ms]
       change: [−2.4563% −2.2404% −2.0360%] (p = 0.00 Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/simulated-time/run: :broken_heart: Performance has regressed.
       time:   [25.525 s 25.525 s 25.525 s]
       thrpt:  [160.47 KiB/s 160.47 KiB/s 160.47 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [+1.1497% +1.1497% +1.1497%] (p = 0.00 −1.1367% −1.1367%]
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [26.425 ms 26.454 ms 26.496 ms]
       change: [+0.3618% +0.5632% +0.7497%] (p = 0.00 Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/simulated-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [25.252 s 25.252 s 25.252 s]
       thrpt:  [162.21 KiB/s 162.21 KiB/s 162.21 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [−0.1937% −0.1937% −0.1937%] (p = 0.00 +0.1941% +0.1941%]

Download data for profiler.firefox.com or download performance comparison data.

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 05 '25 18:11 github-actions[bot]

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchchore-idna-adapter
TestbedOn-prem

🚨 1 Alert

BenchmarkMeasure
Units		ViewBenchmark Result
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
(Limit %)
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/simulated-timeLatency
seconds (s)		📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)		15.04 s
(+0.33%)Baseline: 15.00 s
15.03 s
(100.11%)

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
nanoseconds (ns)
(Result Δ%)		Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
1-conn/1-100mb-req/mtu-1504 (aka. Upload)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		202,410,000.00 ns
(-2.17%)Baseline: 206,909,836.07 ns
216,927,209.84 ns
(93.31%)
1-conn/1-100mb-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. Download)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		198,700,000.00 ns
(-1.13%)Baseline: 200,961,737.70 ns
211,754,875.84 ns
(93.83%)
1-conn/1-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. HPS)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		38,695,000.00 ns
(+25.91%)Baseline: 30,732,068.85 ns
40,875,363.62 ns
(94.67%)
1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. RPS)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		288,450,000.00 ns
(-1.13%)Baseline: 291,756,262.30 ns
304,354,411.18 ns
(94.77%)
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		119,140,000.00 ns
(+0.43%)Baseline: 118,626,918.03 ns
120,767,887.46 ns
(98.65%)
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		584,910.00 ns
(-1.43%)Baseline: 593,418.46 ns
617,007.61 ns
(94.80%)
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)		15,045,000,000.00 ns
(+0.33%)Baseline: 14,996,032,786.89 ns
15,029,202,410.93 ns
(100.11%)

1000-streams/each-1-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		13,584,000.00 ns
(-2.87%)Baseline: 13,984,688.52 ns
14,871,498.82 ns
(91.34%)
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		18,942,000,000.00 ns
(-0.12%)Baseline: 18,963,980,327.87 ns
19,244,149,881.63 ns
(98.43%)
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		47,594,000.00 ns
(-5.97%)Baseline: 50,618,406.56 ns
57,426,013.99 ns
(82.88%)
RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame()📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		109,580,000.00 ns
(-0.10%)Baseline: 109,684,852.46 ns
111,652,559.72 ns
(98.14%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		89.52 ns
(+0.86%)Baseline: 88.75 ns
89.80 ns
(99.68%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		105.88 ns
(-0.15%)Baseline: 106.04 ns
107.15 ns
(98.82%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		91.56 ns
(+1.65%)Baseline: 90.07 ns
94.57 ns
(96.82%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		106.89 ns
(+0.31%)Baseline: 106.56 ns
107.61 ns
(99.34%)
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 3f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		1,590,500.00 ns
(-2.20%)Baseline: 1,626,357.05 ns
1,788,323.38 ns
(88.94%)
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 7f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		5,048,700.00 ns
(-0.33%)Baseline: 5,065,363.93 ns
5,110,593.24 ns
(98.79%)
decode 1048576 bytes, mask ff📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		3,028,200.00 ns
(-0.03%)Baseline: 3,029,063.93 ns
3,046,931.27 ns
(99.39%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask 3f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		5,535.60 ns
(-25.42%)Baseline: 7,422.24 ns
10,414.66 ns
(53.15%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask 7f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		19,424.00 ns
(-1.97%)Baseline: 19,814.87 ns
20,477.17 ns
(94.86%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask ff📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		10,686.00 ns
(-6.08%)Baseline: 11,377.50 ns
12,559.35 ns
(85.08%)
sent::Packets::take_ranges📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		4,597.80 ns
(-2.81%)Baseline: 4,730.68 ns
4,965.28 ns
(92.60%)
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		25,525,000,000.00 ns
(+0.36%)Baseline: 25,434,422,442.24 ns
26,073,382,879.69 ns
(97.90%)
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		24,685,000.00 ns
(-4.32%)Baseline: 25,799,924.09 ns
27,067,190.44 ns
(91.20%)
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		25,167,000,000.00 ns
(-0.02%)Baseline: 25,172,871,287.13 ns
25,220,428,385.68 ns
(99.79%)
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		24,766,000.00 ns
(-4.21%)Baseline: 25,853,798.68 ns
27,485,159.50 ns
(90.11%)
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		25,252,000,000.00 ns
(-1.41%)Baseline: 25,613,821,782.18 ns
25,824,915,988.32 ns
(97.78%)
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		26,454,000.00 ns
(-2.44%)Baseline: 27,115,617.16 ns
28,657,945.44 ns
(92.31%)
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		24,979,000,000.00 ns
(-0.06%)Baseline: 24,993,475,247.52 ns
25,040,872,952.52 ns
(99.75%)
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold		25,259,000.00 ns
(-4.15%)Baseline: 26,352,372.94 ns
28,081,813.41 ns
(89.95%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 05 '25 18:11 github-actions[bot]

Needs MSRV >= 1.82.

larseggert avatar Nov 10 '25 08:11 larseggert