Motiejus Jakštys

You could take into account that XSD generation would be very useful to have as well (sometime in far future I guess). It is a separate task, but looks on...

Since I like compressing things and comparing see how well they do it: ``` $ ls --block-size=K -1sS *.tar.xz | tac 36404K zig-x86_64-linux-musl-baseline-min.tar.xz 40932K zig-x86_64-linux-musl-baseline.tar.xz 53520K zig-x86_64-linux-musl-baseline-dbg.tar.xz ``` The first...

This is mindblowing/amazing, depending on how one sees things. I am watching this closely now. Good job, @david-vanderson ! Somewhat unrelated question before this gets rolled out: how far back...

:heart: from the past: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/pull/15573 ``` #if (defined __FreeBSD__ AND defined __GLIBC__) OR __GLIBC_MINOR__ == 32 OR __GLIBC_MINOR__ == 33 OR _ZIG_UH_ #define dn_expand __dn_expand #define dn_skipname __dn_skipname #endif /*_ZIG_UH_*/...

Maybe related to http://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/14815

Headscale or tailscaled would need to know how to nudge the DNS server to add the dns txt records for verification. This is hard, because everyone uses a different DNS...

There are >1 people curious about this specific CPU :) Do you have any results from your test?

I did a test myself. With this package the upper frequency went up from 1.8GHz to 2.2GHz. A welcome improvement, but still has ways to go.  Output of `throttled.py...

Unfortunately, that didn't work. It went down to 1.7GHz after a couple of days of uptime and stayed at that. 

@carlosabalde those didn't help (both were set to "performance"). HOWEVER removing `tlp` fixed the cpufreq issues on my machine! I had tlp enabled for all my laptops since forever for...