Manfred Moser

This will definitely need a release notes entry @colebow for 451

Dont we need to document this somehow? Also .. need release notes entry.

Great @amogh-jahagirdar - pull me in as reviewer and I can help with merge

Lets leave it as an internal, experts-only thing for now then, and keep an eye out if this problems comes up again.

Maybe closely moving it to storage table semantics breaks the abstraction, but that is NOT necessary. The abstraction can stay with the fact that it is a materialized view and...

Sure .. if we can improve the writing and inserting that would be good. At the same time we should allow maintenance on materialized views and not force users into...

Agreed to proceed with ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW EXECUTE as approach in TCC. Suggestions is to follow the path of grammar PR, an SPI PR, and then a connector implementation PR....

I am not an expert here but I think this looks good. Could you maybe check @electrum or @dain ?

@dain @electrum .. any chance to look?

This should be fine to merge .. reopening so @electrum or @dain can chime in