Chris Morrow
Chris Morrow
Is this question still relevant?
no reply so closing.
I mean closed.
'class' sounds very vendor specific... there's perhaps another word we could use here? how about 'role' ?
@sourcequench can probably answer this, or get us pointed in the right direction. I suspect that 'overwrite' is an intended (implicit) result, and making it explicit seems ok to me....
what is the tool you are using to show this? (where is the tool source, how is it being used, pretend I know nothing of grpc and whatever grp-curl is)
Is it the case that we want to support 2 possible policy languages (json/proto) or to support 1, but have 'many' input options (with a proto -> json conversion cleanly...
I think the discussion in #99 ended up with: "Hey, the gRPC base level code, for reaosns, expects JSON for this, so this service is just implementing that wish." I...
I think we are still debating what/if this policy is to be used... I believe it was supposed to be a policy (in what is clearly a protobuf form, but...