monlovesmango

agree that event kind ranges maybe aren't necessary for ephemeral and replaceable events, but that doesn't automatically make it a mistake. its also not relevant to considerations of private events,...

root field based access control suffers from the same flaw as tag based access control though. namely, that a relay has to run a query first before it can ascertain...

thanks @vitorpamplona, I suppose this is true and its not as big of a deal as I imagine. I still think spec's should be designed to use relay resources as...

imo the main question is less about whether `CLOSED` should be used for only private events and more about, should relays have to run queries before being able to determine...

just created #1083 for restricted events. I ended up going with tag based identification of restricted events, as that is more flexible and seems to be what people want, but...

@Giszmo in your opinion, if a client is making best effort to abide by this NIP would that include first querying for the kind they are saving? If so should...

does this cover nip 33?

hey all, know I am joining the conversation late but wanted to get your thoughts on using a new replaceable event kind to store pinned events instead? this might allow...

@mikedilger I love this idea, thanks for putting this nip together! and agree with everything @eskema has said here so far. and agree with @fiatjaf suggestion to use this rather...

I only found one profile with "relay" in metadata, however this kind 0 is really nonstandard, has a content key within the content field. note1q7w36puvtxukgflu2kvugyral4tvk938lj9mmq7djvxugftazdlq2sf65g @ismyhc are you sure Damus...