Mohsin Kaleem

@bdarcus I got really envious with how nice bibtex-actions looks so I decided to try and add some color to bibtex-completion. This may break compatibility with your package because it...

Just tested it out with helm and ivy, seems to be working fine :smile:.

@bdarcus > Second, I'm not personally convinced I like a face for individual fields; at first glance it seems you've gone from no color to too much color ;-) I...

@bdarcus > BTW, you can search for "has:pdf" etc in bibtex-actions, and I believe "=has-pdf" in bibtex-completion. Interesting. I knew bibtex-actions had that (but don't know how it's implemented) but...

@bdarcus The more you know :trophy:. Incidentally I've also cleaned up my grouping function to now get the group directly from the bibtex entry, removing the need to have it...

@bdarcus > Is this because the group function is independent of the candidates, just like affixation and annotation functions? Kind of. I meant before I tied narrowing to grouping so...

> Do you see a way to adapt this approach to also achieve that; where groups of fields are formatted differently? I mean the obvious approach that comes to mind...

@tmalsburg So the gist of what you'd like changed is: 1. Create an alist configuration mapping fields to faces. 2. Make the default configuration empty, so users have to explicitly...

@tmalsburg, @bdarcus > Specifically, the faces would need to work for people who have themes with dark text on light background and the reverse (night mode). I'm not really much...

@bdarcus I've switched from multiple defface's to a single alist and pushed onto this PR. Atm the default faces are the same as before to make it easier for you...