Use consistent language for "states"

Open Tc-Fast opened this issue 1 month ago • 2 comments

Closes #2052

Nov 04 '25 07:11 Tc-Fast

Torsten S: I will provide a suggestion based on this, where we have consistency with usage in the XML. I will diskuss this with @Tc-Fast

Nov 18 '25 15:11 chrbertsch

FMI Design meeting:

We suggest to limit this PR to only make the distinction between state machine modes and other states. There are more changes necessary to fix inconsistencies w.r.t. continuous(-time), discrete(-time) and clocked variables and states that should be done in a different PR.

Dec 04 '25 13:12 chrbertsch

I changed the commit to now only include the distinction between "state machine modes" and other "states".

Dec 17 '25 07:12 Tc-Fast