Be clearer about units in RobotR3 motor
The only controversial part is the name RaR.
Without this change based on
La.L=250/(2*D*w) and C.C=(1/250)*D/w
one might conclude that D has unit Siemens (inverted Ohm).
Summary by CodeRabbit
-
New Features
- Introduced a configurable parameter for adjusting the motor’s electric resistance.
-
Refactor
- Updated parameter definitions to clarify motor frequency and damping.
- Revised component calculations for inductance, resistance, and capacitance to rely on the new resistance parameter, enhancing simulation flexibility and accuracy.
Walkthrough
This change updates the motor model in the RobotR3 utilities by adjusting parameter types and modifying calculation formulas. The parameter w is now defined as an angular frequency, and the damping constant D includes a unit annotation. A new parameter RaR (electric resistance) has been added, and the formulas for the inductor, resistor, and capacitor have been updated to reference RaR rather than hardcoded constants. These modifications provide greater flexibility in tuning the motor parameters.
Changes
| File | Changes Summary |
|---|---|
| Modelica/Mechanics/.../RobotR3/Utilities/Motor.mo | - Parameters: Updated w from Real (time constant) to SI.AngularFrequency (angular frequency), and added unit "1" to D.- New Parameter: Added RaR as SI.Resistance with a default of 250.- Calculations: Modified inductor ( La), resistor (Ra), and capacitor (C) expressions to use RaR instead of a fixed value. |
Poem
In my burrow of code I hop with cheer,
Tweaks in motor parameters now appear.
From angular spins to resistance so true,
My circuits dance as they compute anew.
With every change, my logic does gleam—
A rabbit's delight in a motor's dream!
🐇✨
📜 Recent review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5542be30bc34d3a383adcde117ddbd9b11f7ecb3 and 544d814c8c17b88e5e8e2d3a983d23766902a0b1.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Modelica/Mechanics/MultiBody/Examples/Systems/RobotR3/Utilities/Motor.mo(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Modelica/Mechanics/MultiBody/Examples/Systems/RobotR3/Utilities/Motor.mo
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: external_c_checks_cmake_windows-cygwin
- GitHub Check: external_c_checks_cmake_windows-msvc
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Generate unit testing code for this file.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai generate docstringsto generate docstrings for this PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository. - Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
I find the experiment with coderabbit interesting and the statements look suggestive. However, the summary completely misses the intent of the changes.
I find the experiment with coderabbit interesting and the statements look suggestive. However, the summary completely misses the intent of the changes.
Yes, it's experimental. The summary feature is rather useless. The actual review comments seem more promising to me, however that's not part of a free service and only available now during the coderabbit trial phase of 14 days.
But the poem, oh, the poem...