Trac2GitHub Transition of Modelica Assocication Projects

**Comment by hansolsson on 19 Oct 2017 08:34 UTC** Martin: One possibility is to just use C-version of Lapack Hans: Another possibility is to provide a few C-macros so that...

**Comment by hansolsson on 19 Oct 2017 09:01 UTC** Hans: NullFunction() for generating Null-pointer to function (all capital smells like C-macro). According to Martin S all function pointers are the...

**Modified by beutlich on 10 Jan 2018 08:23 UTC**

**Comment by hansolsson on 25 Jan 2018 09:17 UTC** This would also suggest creating a component of the same function (and connecting it instead of calling the function). For a...

**Comment by jmattsson on 6 Feb 2018 11:26 UTC** Need to consider what this means for expandable connectors. What can you do with it in a function?

**Modified by beutlich on 10 Jan 2018 08:19 UTC**

**Comment by jmattsson on 15 Jun 2016 13:54 UTC** This may need an MCP, but I think starting with a discussion is reasonable.

**Comment by sjoelund.se on 15 Jun 2016 14:02 UTC** > I suggest reintroducing `Subtask.decouple()` as just `decouple()`, defined as returning the value its argument had at the previous time step....

**Comment by hansolsson on 15 Jun 2016 14:43 UTC** Replying to [ticket:2010 jmattsson]: > I suggest reintroducing `Subtask.decouple()` as just `decouple()`, defined as returning the value its argument had at...

**Comment by jmattsson on 15 Jun 2016 14:56 UTC** Replying to [comment:2 sjoelund.se]: > I assume the last accepted step (and not any intermediate steps), Yes, that seems the most...