mne-tools
DOC: Publication?
We might consider doing a new publication (JOSS?) to document the 1.0 release. The pipeline has come a long way since MNE-Study-template, and some contributors (e.g., @hoechenberger) are not on that paper.
So I was just reading up on the JOSS requirements, and they state that "The paper should be between 250-1000 words. Authors submitting papers significantly longer than 1000 words may be asked to reduce the length of their paper."
I actually found this a little disappointing and I'm wondering if publishing e.g. in Behavior Research Methods or a similar journal would do the project more justice. However, this may come with publication fees. But a submission to JOSS feels like underselling our work.
What are your thoughts on this?
To me the value in publication really comes from the citations (to us, and to others it's the cite-ability) rather than the number of words we get to write and revise. So I'm actually happy with the number of words being small personally
To me the value in publication really comes from the citations (to us, and to others it's the cite-ability) rather than the number of words we get to write and revise. So I'm actually happy with the number of words being small personally
Agreed
Our doc is our best written material
@hoechenberger WDYT about going forward with JOSS? Any bandwidth for this at your end? If not I could try drafting something in the coming months
ёwould also be great to add references to the papers based on which the pipeline is structured (methods & params used, order of steps & substeps applied, etc.)
