Matija Nalis

Results 925 comments of Matija Nalis

- This OsmAnd issue (https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/9970#issuecomment-837135536) also has some discussion about Wikimedia commons requirement "[Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#Must_be_realistically_useful_for_an_educational_purpose)"

- (ref: https://github.com/Discostu36/OSM-Photos/issues/28)

Judging by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RelatedTerms history, `RelatedTerm` has been there since 2011. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TagFinder also seems to indicate that there might have been some support for it in Tagfinder already (if it is...

Looking around at https://streetcomplete.github.io/streetcomplete-mapstyle/?provider=jawg&style=dark, the problematic _"line in the middle of pedestrian street"_ is visible in both `dark` and `light` mode, but **not** in `satellite` mode, where it looks normal.

hm, that `function()` is inside `pedestrian-areas:` yaml section, and [highway=pedestrian](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian) (which this issue is about) can be used not only as a **way**, but _also_ as an **area**. Could that...

@Joxit yes, the intention is to distinguish from `highway=pedestrian` way and `highway=pedestrian` polygon (i.e. closed way, area), which currently seems to be impossible.

Although, from UX/accessibility perspective, things should not differ **only** in color (think different types of color blindness etc.)

> I can move node to within a metre without any problems ? @ravenfeld I think this is not about precision of movement, but the issue is about not being...

> @mnalis I vaguely remember you showed something like a crossing that is zebra but legally not actually zebra (?). Could this be relevant here? Hmmm, I don't quite remember;...

> In my case, modifying MAX_MOVE_DISTANCE allows the POI to be moved as requested I believe that moving will work just fine, but note the problem mentioned in https://github.com/Helium314/SCEE/issues/402#issuecomment-1348130302 --...