Michael Norrish
Michael Norrish
Ha! Thanks for the report; I hadn't appreciated this might be a problem. I will have to detect the build-time information about the build size, and then make the code...
I don't think so. I assume the original suggestion was to store open-theory proofs as permanent records of theorems. In contrast, the `otknl` approach *generates* open-theory proofs as build products.
This is an interesting one. I eventually want to subsume this awful soup (`namedCases`, `pairCases` urge) into a more potent `Cases_on` tactic, but I think if the user has gone...
Thanks for the issue. I agree that this would be nice. Note that it is reasonable to have `rename` list elements targeting separate parts of the same assumption, but this...
It's slow but called very infrequently; this doesn't feel like a high priority.
I'd be happy to receive a PR along these lines.
You could keep an overload in place to simplify your first task.
Agreed that this would be a great tweak!