Markus Mützel

Ok. To summarize what I understood so far: We need to install `wx-config` to allow projects to use that tool with a default name. Both the wxWidgets 3.0 "development" package...

How would that help with the original question (build wxWidget 3.0 and wxWidget 3.2 variants as split packages in a single PKGBUILD)? IIUC, both "-utils" packages would be necessary as...

I appreciate that you took the time to explain the situation. And I'm sorry you feel like it was a waste (it wasn't for me). My main intention was to...

This escalated pretty quickly from slowly dropping support for Windows 7/8.1 (which is probably fine) to potentially discontinuing MINGW64. I might not be understanding the entire picture. But please also...

I probably wasn't clear in my original comment. Trying again: We are using mingw64 (and mingw32) packages built by the MSYS2 project (this!) as a "base" for packaging Octave for...

I didn't want to take over this discussion. But since we already are there: Is there a Linux toolchain for UCRT?

@Biswa96: Thanks for confirming what I already thought. Also thanks for stressing again that this is *not* about removal of mingw32/mingw64. I was afraid that the discussion would take that...

> Maybe it is worth playing warning, my rationale is that -Os has a practical purpose always when used, but say -Ofast guarantees numeric faults. I'm not sure I understand...

> PR is not wrong, just that probably needs some discussion/consideration. I'm happy to discuss. But I don't understand *which* changes you are proposing.

I'm not sure why one of the checks of this PR was failing: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/runs/8095576089?check_suite_focus=true IIUC, that check uses `make` to build OpenBLAS. Afaict, this PR doesn't touch the Makefile rules.