Marcelo Bezerra

What INAV target is recommended by the manufacturer for this board?

I am not convinced we need the profile changes. We reverted to better behaving defaults and in 8.0, with the baro filtering changes and potential gps weight adjustments by hdop,...

I may revisit this in 8.0 Right now we are in the stage where we are talking about our grievances with the configurator and what we could do to improve...

@sensei-hacker can this pr be closed?

To be merged, this needs to at least add SKIP_RELEASES as mentioned above. As it stands, this does not comply with the new hardware policy. https://github.com/iNavFlight/inav/blob/master/docs/policies/NEW_HARDWARE_POLICY.md

Good to see f745 becoming more common. It is certainly a better long term choice vs f722.

> > Good to see f745 becoming more common. It is certainly a better long term choice vs f722. > > Some checks were not successful, can you help me...

@YI-BOYANG can you update to the latest master? That should fix your build.

I may change the fontPage uint8_t array to attr uint8_t array and combine with the blink flag.

There are still some conflicts. Can you fix those and update the target.c entries to use the new TIM_USE_OUTPUT_AUTO?