Mirko Mälicke

Hey @Duke-of-Lizard, great to hear about your upcoming contributions! Great! I guess, as at the time `OrdinaryKriging.transform` is being called it is already clear which combinations of points will be...

Hey there, Thanks for your question. Well, while haversine is not implemented into scikit-gstat, The `Variogram.dist_func` argument does take a callable. The function signature has to be like: ```Python def...

Hey there, Yes, the Variogram class is using an instance of `skgstat.MetricSpace` to handle coordinates. In case you need to calculate the same set of coordinates for different Variogram over...

Hey, @MuellerSeb thanks for all the insights! I wasn't aware of these implications, that is very good to know. I think I need to look into the paper in some...

Hey there, Yes, that would be great. Unfortunately, it would also be a considerable amount of work, that I cannot afford right now. The main reason is, that the `Variogram`...

Hey, Thanks, sounds great! I am not so sure anymore if it is really that much work. But first, I have to say, that I am not too familiar with...

Hey there, @digital-idiot , just out of curiosity, is there any progress on this issue? Best, Mirko

Hey, Yes, the jit decorator is all over the place and numba is also a dependency for a few versions now. Mainly, because I am using it in the `skgstat.estimators`...

Thanks, Sebastian. Finally. Yours is also accepted, right? I'll enable the discussion soon, until then I'll keep this issue open as a reminder

Hey, thank you two for reporting! Can any of you confirm, that is only happening very close / at observation locations? I am just wondering if we are talking about...