Matthew Lutze
Matthew Lutze
> Adding some source comments for some of my comments might be useful. I do not know what this means.
> @mlutze There are no conflicts. Does this mean I can merge this or do you want to experiment? Let's at least wait for one tick on the arewefast graph...
> Will this PR not use `SetUnification.unifyAll`? or is that later? Later. This one only deals with one constraint at a time anyway.
@JonathanStarup claims Adaptor
> @mlutze Why did we omit static imports-- they should also be rewritten :) updated
I'll do Object and Time/*
I claim `Test.Exp.I*`
I claim `*String*`
I claim `*Handler*`
> I'll take everything alphabetically after and including `main/test/flix/Test.Exp.Jvm.NewObject.flix` NB: I'm doing all the ones with "Handler" in the name