mlr3proba icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
mlr3proba copied to clipboard

Allow specification of censoring model when calculating IPCW weighted Brier/Graf Score

Open adibender opened this issue 5 years ago • 4 comments

In theory, it would also be possible to specify the learner which is used to learn the censoring model, tune the parameters, etc.... For now I'd restrict to simple parametric learner, e.g. coxph, but raises questions. E.g. what to do in n <p cases.

adibender avatar Nov 11 '20 13:11 adibender

Do we really want to do this? I know this is possible in {pec} but it has no good theoretical justification. How do you validate the censoring model? What about data bias which just gets propagated forward by the second learner. I'm not convinced this is something we should implement

RaphaelS1 avatar Nov 01 '21 20:11 RaphaelS1

Yes, vlaidation of the censoring model is a problem. But we should allow it should be able to a) recreate results from literature b) use it for comparison when they develop alternatives or similar

Is it hard to do technically?

adibender avatar Nov 04 '21 22:11 adibender

Is it hard to do technically?

Nope

recreate results from literature

It's an interesting argument. Okay, let's do it. I'll bump this up my list

RaphaelS1 avatar Mar 24 '22 21:03 RaphaelS1

  • Paper => https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bimj.200610301
  • Implement Cox and Akritas (non-parametric regression mentioned in the paper above)

bblodfon avatar Apr 16 '24 16:04 bblodfon