Matteo Lodi
Matteo Lodi
nope cause this is another service, please create a new one and ignore the other one that already exist
please open a PR and follow the guidelines. Issues are not meant to be used for reviews
hey, thank you for your research. I would not use that wrapper because it does abuse the service. We can keep the issue open to wait for a future release...
as I mentioned, if the APIs are not available, then we can consider this issue as blocked. If you want to contribute please choose another analyzer.
feel free to suggest, there's no limit. I would allow the support for all types of observables. In case it is "generic", that would be the real request. On the...
yet another analyzer which requires payment...right. I mean, nevermind. We can skip this. It would not probably make sense anyway in the context of an Analyzer.
this one would be cool addition: https://github.com/intelowlproject/IntelOwl/issues/2444 to add in the "malware_tools_analyzer" too.
> We have to create two different analyzers? one for observable hash, one for file? yes, you can copy similar approach we had with Triage or Virustotal for instance. We...
some options: * read the doc to see if anything changes * search anywhere in the internet if there is someone who already knows it * ask to their support...
hey, new scanners cannot be implemented right now until the issue #1393 is solved. @tinaoberoi please if you want to contribute, pick one of the new analyzer issue which is...