Matteo Lodi
Matteo Lodi
the service is back online. We should integrate it and then notify the creator to have IntelOwl added to the homepage.
yep, it is not required to manage an internal cache like I mentioned. That would be maybe the optimal solution because we cannot request all the data from the service...
that sounds good, let's try this!
solved with v6.0.0
On a second thought, due to the similarity of the "scanners" with the "analyzers" it could make sense that the "scanner" would be a subtype of "analyzers" to simplify code...
thinking about this again and given the complexity of such customization, we decided to opt out from this option and implement scanners like normal analyzers.
the second query must use the AS value extracted by the first query, that's the idea. Then, the third query requires the AS too so you have it for that...
maybe you can use https://pypi.org/project/pybgpranking2/ if you like instead of just classic requests -> not required, only if the library works as intended and simplify the process
solved in v6.0.0
yep you are welcome. What we need is a new analyzer that download periodically these rules and execute them.