Markus KARG

@kazumura I still do not understand what your point is. If we decide for more profiles, we simply have more brands. So what?

This is nonsense. If we decide to set up a certification program for a brand called "Jakarta EE 9 Edge Computing Profile" this will not confuse anybody as long as...

If a "Jakarta EE 9 Edge Computing Profile" is clearly described in terms of tests to be passed I cannot see a risk.

Did anyone actually propose _100_ profiles?

Certainly I agree that 100 profiles is a problem. In fact, I doubt that even the MP people want to have 100 profiles. For me it more looks like the...

MP is no "irrelevant". The vendors gathered there are the same gathered in Jakarta EE. It is clear that APIs developed by MP and supported by the Jakarta EE implementations...

@keilw That is true, but what actually do you want to reach by telling this all in *this* thread? What is the point you want to make with it?

@ivargrimstad I kindly like to ask you to put this issue on the agenda of the next meeting.

It seems there is a misunderstanding in SemVer. We can safely apply it at the Platform level, as SemVer is unidirectional in its effects chain: * A breaking change enforces...

I completely respect your opinion and interpretation, but please understand that people daily engaged with specs and legal texts have a common understanding, that is totally different from your personal...