Markus KARG
Markus KARG
Unfortunately records are just in preview even in JDK 15.
Andy's approach sounds feasable to me.
Thank you for bringing up this inconsistency. It seems we should find a consensus and clarify this issue unambiguously in JAX-RS 4.0. Proposal: `getHeaders()` should be read-write, while `getHeaderStrings()` should...
@chkal I want to keep *some* possibility to modify the response headers, as `Response` itself is not a read-only class.
(1) Whether or not I personally do know such a case is not the point here. The point is that we need to be careful. If we break an existing...
> > (2) It is rather odd that Response will become read-only while Request still is read-write. > You mean `jakarta.ws.rs.core.Request` ? If true how is it read-write ? Actually...
Actually from a user's perspective I would be happy to start the CDI container on my own before starting up SeBootstrap, because it gives me the ability to programmatically register...
IMHO Jan is right. From the view of an application programmer what I want to do is write a `main` method which registers Jakarta REST as a CDI extension, then...
> What makes CDI by definition worse than (say) HK2? Is it just an urban myth, an ancient believe that we can't erase from our minds, or is there an...