wireguard-site-to-site icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
wireguard-site-to-site copied to clipboard

Published 20 hours ago • verified publisher icon mjtechguy

Question regarding NAT..

Open Boilerplate4u opened this issue 3 years ago • 2 comments

Any particular reason why using NAT i.e. doesn't regular routing work between the endpoints?

Boilerplate4u avatar Oct 12 '20 19:10 Boilerplate4u

You don't actually need NAT, but then everyone's situation on setting up routing (dynamic or static) is different. I can see your point - somethings will break with NAT. Author can't possibly cover all scenarios. I got it working without NAT, but please don't reach out on how. Completely out of scope here.

gtaws avatar Apr 10 '21 19:04 gtaws

You don't actually need NAT, but then everyone's situation on setting up routing (dynamic or static) is different. I can see your point - somethings will break with NAT. Author can't possibly cover all scenarios. I got it working without NAT, but please don't reach out on how. Completely out of scope here.

this is 100% in the scope of a Site-to-Site VPN and often very important to how they are used, if you have a solution to this problem, i myself and I'm sure others would love to hear it.

bcsanford avatar May 18 '22 15:05 bcsanford