Michael Schellenberger Costa
Michael Schellenberger Costa
@harrism You might be interested in this
@vyasr yes I believe we want to pull some of the foundational features into cccl. Definitely not all but some
I believe that might also be the reason, why the semaphore based mutex implementation is potentially hanging in the tests. However, I a bit terrified that we would have to...
> Sorry for barging into this thread, I've just been looking for ways of doing a mutex when I stumbled upon it. Could you explain why that piece of code...
The deprecation is only enabled for gcc-5 or clang-6 and below, so using gcc-9 is expected to pass without a warning
I am not fully following here. Are you requesting us to implement expression templates for complex?
Note, we should also move this to a central place inside the `__cccl` folder inside libcu++ as this is a generic facility that should be reused throughout the whole project....
I have opened #1562 to consolidate our `if constexpr` handling
I dont think this is a correct implementation, if `a+b-1` overflows then this will create bad outcomes Should this be ```cpp __host__ __device__ constexpr size_t ceil_div(size_t a, size_t b) {...
Actually that is intentional, as that interface is not standard conforming. I missed to remove the documentation for it