mirjak
mirjak
I think we have to allow it because it could be sent before multipath is "negotiated". Also not that QUIC does really negotiate but rather another, which is another reason...
In summary: 1) NEW_CONNECTION_ID and RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID are still allowed and associated to path ID 0. The document says this already, at least that path ID 0 is used. It doesn't...
We actually already say that abandon path IDs MUST be ignored in Section 7 (New Frames): ``` If an endpoint receives a multipath-specific frame with a path identifier that it...
Also from PR #292: **[huitema](https://github.com/huitema) [on Nov 20, 2023](https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/297#r1399608616)** ``` See comments above. In my mind, using the path ID in the nonce pretty much mandates unique path ID. Something...
Sounds like we all agree on this resolution but this might need some clarification in the draft.
Closing this issue now. Please continue discussion in #321
Given this was discussed in #214 already, can we close this issue?
Closing this issue now. Please re-open if you think it needs further discussion.
What do you want to say here @Yanmei-Liu? I think it simply the case if you don't have a CIDs for an unused path ID, you can't open a new...
@Yanmei-Liu can we close this issue and move the discussion to #338 instead?