mirh

Results 1125 comments of mirh

My very educate guess is that diskusage is somewhat failing to read/acquire sdcard permissions (which I'm not asked, on marshmallow) See, I have [16GB total](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9366725/46621260-4e24d580-cb27-11e8-9b48-c61eaa8159fd.png), and call even 6 "system...

I already know my phone partitions.. Was just saying how or why there could be something missing on some phones

Drag and drop that archive (the [usual way](https://github.com/ib/xarchiver/issues/41#issuecomment-352089375)) and you get the error above.

Some random "pre existing idea": https://github.com/mgorny/mirage2iso

https://github.com/claunia/DiscImageChef/tree/master/DiscImageChef.DiscImages/Alcohol120

> Reading manifest: Error processing update_url: An unexpected property was found in the WebExtension manifest. Manifest.json in turn is {"update_url":"https://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx","manifest_version":2,"name":"__MSG_appName__","short_name":"__MSG_appShortName__","default_locale":"it","version":"0.3","description":"__MSG_appDesc__","permissions":["proxy","tabs","storage","notifications"],"icons":{"16":"icons/icon16.png","32":"icons/icon32.png","48":"icons/icon48.png","128":"icons/icon128.png"},"background":{"scripts":["background.js"]},"browser_action":{"browser_style":true,"default_popup":"popup/popup.html","default_icon":{"19":"icons/icon19.png","38":"icons/icon38.png"}},"applications":{"gecko":{"id":"jaaackgcbbghbogihiaakoeljhpaimao@chrome-store-foxified-unsigned"}}}

It installs eventually (it doesn't seem to be exactly working though, but that's another matter), but I thought you'd have been interested to this.

That would also allow to have per-generation information about extensions.

And there's also [glxinfo](https://people.freedesktop.org/~imirkin/glxinfo/). They are all tools that run *empirically* on real hardware though, which is quite different than this.

AFAIK the hardware just reports what the driver tells him to. I'm not aware of any information other than the model number that you dynamically query. It would certainly be...