Michael Paus
Michael Paus
I am already trying to apply that to my own project :-)
A major problem is that the whole AWT classes are missing. Even code which just needs some AWT classes, e.g., BufferedImage to do some offline image processing, can't be compiled...
That are exactly the problems that I had in mind. Many software makes use of AWT classes without actually trying to run an AWT application and thus cannot be compiled...
I am using it all the time on desktop and Android and it works. For Android just use the dependencies: ``` implementation("io.github.microutils:kotlin-logging-jvm:2.1.23") implementation("org.slf4j:slf4j-android:1.7.35") ```
This is not the intended usage. First try to follow the examples before you make your own experiments.
Just stumbled over the same problem. Will that ever get fixed?
> I would propose that if we keep modularization then we get rid of these service definitions in META-INF if possible just to avoid duplicate definitions. That would be a...
And neither JPackage/jlink nor GraalVM native-image NEED the module system. I have shown with Dirk how to use JPackage without modules here: https://github.com/dlemmermann/JPackageScriptFX and when I build JavaFX applications with...
This issue is already two years old. I now stumbled over the same problem when trying to run a program with JDK11 from Maven running with JDK10. I also don't...
I just reported this to https://bugreport.java.com too: internal review ID : 9061930