Maria Ines Parnisari

@ktrz will this be worked on soon? If not, could I get some pointers on what needs to be changed so maybe I can send a PR?

AFAIK this was already done and documented here https://github.com/benchmark-action/github-action-benchmark#:~:text=Additionally%2C%20even%20though%20there%20is%20no%20explicit%20example%20for%20them%2C%20you%20can%20use%20customBiggerIsBetter%20and%20customSmallerIsBetter%20to%20use%20this%20action%20and%20create%20your%20own%20graphs%20from%20your%20own%20benchmark%20data.%20The%20name%20in%20these%20tools%20define%20which%20direction%20%22is%20better%22%20for%20your%20benchmarks.

This was fixed in https://github.com/benchmark-action/github-action-benchmark/pull/32

Hello, what is needed to move this PR forward?

> Do I have to make changes in the files of this https://github.com/openfga/language? @professorabhay no, that shouldn't be necessary.

@openfga/backend any thoughts on this? Would appreciate more inputs :) --- @jon-whit Your suggestion is a good N+1 because it solves the problem I mentioned. The suggestion I made was...

I had opened https://github.com/bufbuild/protoc-gen-validate/pull/546 but @elliotmjackson closed it with "won't fix" 🤔

@Kernald [`protovalidate`](https://github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate), the next generation of this tool, supports custom validation using CEL expressions, and also custom error messages :)

> Playground hostname still can't be changed, but why ? 🤔 @Mararok sorry for the late response 😅 if I remember correctly, it's because at the time (https://github.com/openfga/openfga/pull/68) we added...

@karlseguin i'm happy to send a PR but i would need some guidance. What kind of benchmarks would be useful?