Jorge Revuelta comments

Results 34 comments of


                                            Jorge Revuelta

Another Primary Key issue

That's exactly I ment. I got what you explained in mind but the tests didn't pass I couldn't get it to work any further, erasing the `primaryKey` from the `Model`...

Update: ``` swift User_spec__Should_decode_JSON_User_objects /Users/buddybuild/workspace/EbikemotionTests/UserSpec.swift:38 failed: caught "Invalid value", "Expected object of type string for property 'identifier' on object of type 'User', but received: 170" ``` When running tests **without**...

Another Primary Key issue

But... I'm using a custom transform to cast the Integer returned from the JSON to the String of the Model, Am I wrong? ``` swift public class PrimaryKeyMapping: Transform {...

Another Primary Key issue

Ooooooh is that why! I didn't even realized It was a conflict with the way the data checked the existance of an object! You might think of me as a...

Another Primary Key issue

It seems fine to me, I actually like closures... haha. I think that with this we solve the issue where the `inout` with the primary key throws the exception. And...

Rubocop: Enable linter for FastlaneCore::ConfigItem `is_string` in all files

Does autocorrect fix it? 😅

Rubocop: Enable linter for FastlaneCore::ConfigItem `is_string` in all files

De we want to just remove it or to replace it for something else?

Rubocop: Enable linter for FastlaneCore::ConfigItem `is_string` in all files

I have a working regex... https://regex101.com/r/SXIbmK/1 that finds the group, later on we can add the logic. Edit: nevermind, rubocop doesn't work with regard 😅 Edit 2: I'd like to...

Rubocop: Enable linter for FastlaneCore::ConfigItem `is_string` in all files

It seems easy to replace whose the value is `true`, even though automatically we don't know if those are dynamic values... For the `false` vaulues, is a lottery

Rubocop: Enable linter for FastlaneCore::ConfigItem `is_string` in all files

Actually, we could make a small PR for each `Action` and see if that produces regressions, step by step. Thoughts? Anyone to make the list and assign pieces for each...