Thomas BERNARD

I have rebased on master. @svenauhagen @juampe thank you for your testing ;)

it looks like github doesn't see that I have rebased and force pushed the branch

@SyedGhazanferAnwar good idea. Why don't you contribute it yourself ?

I am not aware of any other discussion about a Node.js wrapper.

miniupnpd doesn't not support nat on nat setups directly without specific configuration. please read #333

this may be a duplicate of #299

In almost 18 years, you are the first to make such a bug report :laughing: Yes, the command line parsing of upnpc is not very good and could be rewritten...

@sblagodatskikh could you run `miniupnpd` in verbose mode (with `-vv` option ?) and tell we which messages you have ?

@sblagodatskikh could you check with the code from the branch https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp/tree/issue-663 ? thanks

@sblagodatskikh checkout the branch `issue-663`, change to directory `netfilter_nft` and `$ make && ./testnftpinhole` and tell me what happens ;) I guess we have some work to do to fix...