Mark Mikofski
Mark Mikofski
closes #74
relevant to #88, currently the `gen_coeffs` solver is very sensitive to initial guess, and so any non sunpower module is hard to solve for. when using PVLife we never had...
I have used this constraint successfully for years, but it's time to let this go 1. It is too restrictive. It fits well SunPower modules, but not other modules and...
**Problem**: currently cells are calculated one at a time, lazily as needed. This works fine if only a few cells, but if a large array has a very large number...
From issue #25: > Another even better option would be to allow any expression to be used as the breakdown current, and implement this as an object that the user...
# problem There is both an [`Igen()` method in `pvconstants`](../blob/master/pvmismatch/pvmismatch_lib/pvconstants.py#L214-L215) and an [`Igen` property in `pvcell`](../blob/master/pvmismatch/pvmismatch_lib/pvcell.py#L198-L207) # proposal use the formula in the method _as_ the property, but change `Isc0`...
# problem there is no developer section in the docs, contributors don't know how to update, build, or deploy docs, any arbitrary conventions or traditions that have been established are...
# problem despite the improvements made by improvements to `Isat2` by @chetan201 in #64, there is still a systematic bias with temperature. # proposal Other models have an additional temperature...
There are some [comments in issue 52](./52#issuecomment-356496646) that there is no guidance or methods to help users determine what reverse bias coefficients to use. Maybe add something to the wiki...
The band gap, `Eg`, is constant in [`diode.py` line 10](../blob/master/pvmismatch/contrib/gen_coeffs/diode.py#L10) but different tech would have a different band gap so it should be a variable.