Mikolaj

Looking at the likes it's not only our project that would benefit from this one :) The PR is still up for merge

Actually there is an issue with this implementation, which I believe was not a problem in our CI/CD back when I did the initial PR. But it is now, when...

From a quick look it needs a bit of a rewrite, I think it wasn't properly tested before merging my draft. How I see it done to be correct: -...

> Question: Are you willing to pay for this tool? Or free again? @tonyqus to be fair many were willing to pay for moq but most don't like to be...

> Hi @rzn34 , There are a few reasons I want to avoid this. Please excuse the unstructured brain dump: > > * I don't know Moq well at all....

I was in the same situation recently, mocked some methods without any issues, but then InvokeMethodAsync just wouldn't work with Moq. After decompiling and reading through code quickly I came...

> After an investigation in #10883 and discussing the implications with @Frassle we are leaning to close this issue and recommend other Pulumi mechanisms for the use cases here: >...

Have you been able to find a solution to this issue?

node v20.12.1 and the same story, seems like it wasn't fixed upstream, or maybe never was a node issue first of all

Well, even the docs linked in the code indicate that: https://github.com/graphql/graphql-over-http/blob/main/spec/GraphQLOverHTTP.md#processing-the-response In our apollo server we get most of the errors as well formatter json and errors field, but there...