Don't isolate namespace

[mikker]

Isolating namespace adds a bit of confusion around the routes. For a gem like ours this probably adds more trouble than benefit.

[nickisnoble]

Any movement here? Running into this currently – also just generally wondering if there's an example to completely customize routes ie /login. This gem is very hard to google 😄

[mikker]

This is scheduled for 1.0 (#89) but there's no timeline for when that will be done.

The passwordless_for method is merely a helper for mounting the engine. See router_helpers.rb to get a sense of how to customize routes further than with as: or at:.

[nickisnoble]

Ah, thank you!!

[mikker]

Closed by #146