Mikkel Nylander Bundgaard

@jnm2 I would be for using codecov.io. I was planning to look into this or a similar code coverage tool for the analyzers project. And I don't mind the PR...

I think it is fine to filter these away, but I guess we should also work the reducing the number of these tests (easy to say "we" when I have...

@rprouse I think @estrizhok work on Resharper (at least that is how I read the report). I checked that the XML we expose have not changed the last couple of...

Disclaimer, I have not worked on this area of the the code and have never used the events. That being said I think the two cases should be handled consistently....

> Are there any known workarounds for this behavior? @616b2f Can you move the tests to another assembly, so that you don't have unit tests and integration tests in the...

Regarding the strange behaviour, then I think we have seen it before. See https://github.com/nunit/nunit/issues/2841#issuecomment-386074153 . I think I might have a branch for this somewhere

Personally, I think it is fine to close this issue

@maettu-this The range constraint allows negative ranges, but it does not allow range specified in decreasing order, so you have to phrase it like ``` Assert.That(someValue, Is.InRange(-10, 0)); ``` I...

@manfred-brands is right (also xunit analyzers does not check this - at least they didn't the last time I checked).

@Clumi You need to install the "NUnit Project Loader" - https://docs.nunit.org/articles/nunit-engine/extensions/AvailableExtensions.html#nunit-project-loader - to run `.nunit` files