Mikko Leppänen
Mikko Leppänen
> Thanks very much for the PR! > > Having just reviewed with this, I'd like to see a different solution. As per [pydantic/pydantic#9559 (comment)](https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/issues/9559#issuecomment-2160596235) I think the problem is...
Hey! I've now added a basic implementation for the MATCH statement. See the attached zip files. Now that I have a good, in-depth understanding of how the robot "interpreter" works,...
Yeah, I don't see the benefit of creating a draft PR at this point. Well, it's already a fork. I just need to push my branch to remote, and then...
@pekkaklarck, here's the current progress regarding handling sequence patterns (see the attachment file). You are right; `AS ${capture}` is inadequate. Furthermore, do we even need the whole `AS` pattern? The...
> or a specific attribute value from an objects. How should we support matching objects (class pattern) in a Robot context? This is somewhat of a question mark for me....
I think the current implementation is starting to take shape, so it would be good to go over the syntax we want. Below is a summary of what is now...
Great. I mostly agree with what you explain above. Here are some comments: > Another possibility would be using automatic conversion based on the type of the matched value. For...
But in summary, things are shaping up. The big picture is more clear, but obviously, there are still those nuances and corner cases that need to be taken care of....
Yeah, I've already started looking into this `BLOCK` scope thing and a very basic version is running on my computer.