Mike Gerber

> But this is a **separate issue** (has nothing to do with the validator). True, I'll open another GitHub issue for that, if you didn't already.

> No, please do! Just for the sake of completeness: https://github.com/OCR-D/core/issues/1195

I've been bitten by this too. How about: a. Changing the error message as @bertsky proposed and also b. introducing another CLI option `--parameter-file` that only takes a file, while...

With `show_input: False` and `no_input: True` it does not include the inputs anymore.

Do the `$XDG_` variables matter here at all?

> Good idea! Would you be willing to submit a PR for this (and similar stumbling points)? Will do. The only other thing I encountered so far (besides our METS...

> Good idea! Would you be willing to submit a PR for this (and similar stumbling points)? Will do. The only other thing I encountered so far (besides our METS...

[@tfiers's solution above](https://github.com/executablebooks/jupyter-book/issues/1689#issuecomment-1133634051) solves this nicely.

> With the current version including #67 I was able to > > * process `FILE_0017_MAX.tif` successfully without memory explosion7 > > * process the whole document PPN894261851 using the...

Would `working_directory` be a better name for it? ``` with working_directory("/foo/bar"): do_something() ```