Michael Arnaldi

> > There was a long discussion in TS about adding `.js` automatically and it was decided not to do so as TS is no longer accepting any term level...

> @mikearnaldi [#1777 (comment)](https://github.com/gcanti/fp-ts/issues/1777#issuecomment-1250327708) What do you mean by 'ts allows js'?

@steida yes I am aware, it was part of the esm integration, as of my mention of a script I was not referring to the script you posted but to...

> Funny thing [email protected] with Node 16 ESM: > > I need `pipe`. I can't use `import { pipe } from "fp-ts/function"` of course. But I can't use `import {...

> @mikearnaldi Can you please repeat the problem with writing .mts from the start? It enforces the extension and should work well. I had some issues with types, but the...

> So how many hours did you waste now by doing it "properly" by testing all kinds of plugins with extra bells and whistles? > > I got ESM to...

Try with @fp-ts/core we are migrating to an org structure and the new fp-ts will be published there On Wed, 2 Nov 2022, 23:54 Azat S., ***@***.***> wrote: > I'm...

> @mikearnaldi It works! Thanks! > > Off topic: Why are all the useful things in `@fp-ts/data`? What is `@fp-ts/core` for? You're welcome! So the idea is to separate a...

> I will recommend still building to `.js` and `.d.ts` files and using `type: module`. > > There seems to be better support for extensionless imports with `.js` and `.d.ts`...

I was actually looking at the time spent in collections which seemed higher, yes overall it's faster than before but far away from what it was in 0.14.2