Mihai Nita

> Actually, MF1 didn't. MF1 (when written correctly) uses nesting, which is difficult to write. I know that MF1 didn't. "We" Google did. Our lint forbids strings with "partial selection"...

> :offset is not draft. It's therefore stable. ACK. I tracked how that happened, but that's not the point here. So that makes my proposal invalid "I am proposing to...

Maybe a way to handle this is to change the recommended pattern: ``` .input {$like_count :integer} .local $others_count = {$like_count :offset subtract=1} .match $others_count -1 {{Your post has no likes.}}...

> plural offset messages have always featured selection on two different numerical values, num and num-offset Well, but they didn't. I didn't have to write two nested selections, it was...

Updated the Java code to pass the tests equivalent to https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/pull/3198 The .json files are not identical, the ones here "bring back" the `javaIgnore`. Many of them (close to 60)...

Approved, thank you! The custom in the ICU team is that the one who created the PR also gets the honor to merge it :-) So once it's green feel...