Miguel Riem de Oliveira

Perhaps a flag. I have a lot, yes, but might as well follow the same structure.

Right, that's exactly it. Did not implement for lack of time.

This is old. Joint calibration is now running well.

Actually, this was not addressed yet. Reopening.

Perhaps it's better. Can you do it? In any case I am creating a table on the side of the inspect_atom_dataset. So its not a priority.

Right. I agree, we often are reffering to the URDF.

I agree, but what should we do? Is there anything to do on this issue or should we close?

Right. Makes sense. Can you do it?

Hi @manuelgitgomes , > he bagfiles I have recorded come with the joint states already presented. This means that you have the /joint_states topic with messages, right? Not sure about...

Sounds like a good idea. However, about the way to save the calibrated transformation, I think the best is to change the xacro. If you change the xacro you can...