unilm
unilm copied to clipboard
Question about license of layoutlmv2/v3
I noticed that the licenses of layoutlmv2/v3 were changed back to a non-commercial-used license, but the source code of layoutlmv3 is under apache-2.0. Does it mean that I can use the souce code to train a new pretrain model using our own data for commercial use?
BTW, is there any plan to change the license into a permissive one?
same question.
Same question. From my previous query also - #863 .
Can someone from Microsoft team please answer?
All pre-trained LayoutLMv2/v3 models are currently under a non-commercial license. No other constraints.
Just to make sure we got it right - v2/v3 models weights are under non-commercial license. Code is under apache??
@wolfshow, Could you respond to this: https://github.com/microsoft/unilm/issues/873#issuecomment-1384080026
Just to make sure we got it right - v2/v3 models weights are under non-commercial license. Code is under apache??
yes, the non-commercial license is on the models.
All pre-trained LayoutLMv2/v3 models are currently under a non-commercial license. No other constraints.
Can a fine-tuned model on custom dataset with different weights be used for commercial purpose?
So does that mean I can use the code but not the trained model? If I fine-tune it on my own data and use it for commercial use would that be ok?
So does that mean I can use the code but not the trained model? If I fine-tune it on my own data and use it for commercial use would that be ok?
Would like to know the answer to this too
Just to make sure we got it right - v2/v3 models weights are under non-commercial license. Code is under apache??
yes, the non-commercial license is on the models.
Could you please clarify what you mean by "models"? I interpret that to mean pre-trained model weights are under non-commercial use license while using the code to train my own model weights would be permissible for commercial purposes under Apache license, correct?