microsoft
[Feature]: Better API for handling request interceptors
🚀 Feature Request
I'm new to Playwright, coming from Cypress, so I might have missed something here.
It seems to me that when intercepting API requests with the page.route() method, you're not able to specify which http method to intercept?
If it's not possible, I would very much like to see that implemented
Example
I was expecting to see something like:
await page.route('POST', 'my/route', (route) => {
route.fulfill(
{ json },
);
});
Motivation
It would make it possible to write cleaner code. Am I missing something here? How are we supposed to mock two different request to same URL with different http method
You can do this:
await page.route('my/route', (route, request) => {
if (request.method() === 'POST')
route.fulfill({ json })
else
route.continue();
});
@Skn0tt Yes, and it's not exactly ideal. It leads to bloated boilerplate code. Seems like an easy fix to significantly raise developer friendliness?
Also, when both intercepting a request to mock it, and waiting for the same request, you would need to do that separately? And test for method every time?
await page.route('my/route', (route, request) => {
if (request.method() === 'POST')
route.fulfill({ json })
else
route.continue();
});
page.waitForRequest(request =>
request.url() === 'my/route' && request.method() === 'POST',
);
await page.getByText('trigger request').click();
const request = await requestPromise;
Wouldn't it be nicer to somehow define a request and then do whatever with it?
const request = new Request('my/route', 'POST');
await request.fulfill({ json });
await page.getByText('trigger request').click();
await request.waitFor();
Why was this issue closed?
Thank you for your involvement. This issue was closed due to limited engagement (upvotes/activity), lack of recent activity, and insufficient actionability. To maintain a manageable database, we prioritize issues based on these factors.
If you disagree with this closure, please open a new issue and reference this one. More support or clarity on its necessity may prompt a review. Your understanding and cooperation are appreciated.
