microsoft
Code writing with a function call notebook created
@ekzhu
Why are these changes needed?
Added notebook that shows an example of using function calls instead of code executor for creating advanced software apps.
Checks
- [ ] I've included any doc changes needed for https://microsoft.github.io/autogen/. See https://microsoft.github.io/autogen/docs/Contribute#documentation to build and test documentation locally.
- [ ] I've added tests (if relevant) corresponding to the changes introduced in this PR.
- [x] I've made sure all auto checks have passed.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 35.57%. Comparing base (
4a44093) to head (9bc013b). Report is 19 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2121 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 38.14% 35.57% -2.57%
==========================================
Files 78 79 +1
Lines 7865 8089 +224
Branches 1683 1727 +44
==========================================
- Hits 3000 2878 -122
- Misses 4615 4967 +352
+ Partials 250 244 -6
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| unittests | 35.57% <ø> (-2.56%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@ekzhu I'm not familiar with concept of metadata. There is some "metadata" field in lines 926-944. Do you meant that or something different?
Oh, it dessapeared. Copied notebook to the directory again and repaired formatting.
@GregorD1A1 there is still some issue with the notebook. I created a PR to fix it. Please review: #2403