accessibility-insights-windows
accessibility-insights-windows copied to clipboard
[BUG] Issue filling to ADO board for "Issue" work item type does not work
Describe the bug A clear and concise description of what the bug is. AI Win is unable to file bugs to an ADO project that uses the "Issue" instead of "Bug" work item type.
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Open Accessibility Insights for Windows
- Scan any test app
- File a bug to an ADO project that uses Basic processes (uses "Issue" instead of "Bug" work item type)
- See error:
Server error Invalid argument value. Parameter name: typeNames
Expected behavior Should start creating an issue in ADO with pre-populated fields from AI Win
Actual behavior Server error
Screenshots or .GIF
Screenshot of error message
Desktop (please complete the following information):
- OS: [e.g. Windows 10 1809] (Get the version by running
winver
from the command line) Windows 11 Version 21H2 (OS Build 22000.739) - Accessibility Insights for Windows Version: v1.1.1934.01
- Target Application: [e.g. Chrome, Wildlife Manager] Wildlife Manager
- Target Application Version: [e.g. 22] 2.0
Additional context Priority requested - Add any other context about the problem here. This was fixed in AI Web: https://github.com/microsoft/accessibility-insights-web/issues/1009, https://github.com/microsoft/accessibility-insights-web/issues/3874
This issue has been marked as ready for team triage; we will triage it in our weekly review and update the issue. Thank you for contributing to Accessibility Insights!
Changes in Web: https://github.com/microsoft/accessibility-insights-web/pull/568
changing to feature request based on today's conversation. We will triage on our weekly meeting
Adding some notes from the triage conversation:
- To investigate: what is the default for new ADO teams?
- leaving as await interest to understand how many users are impacted by this (first time we hear about it for Win)
Ideas:
- we may be able to use API access to investigate the type but it would mean taking an additional dependency
- We could add a setting for users to choose which type (preferred, needs design)
- To also consider how to test / validate in E2E
workarounds
- copy paste content
- or add the option to file bugs in the instance