Parenthesis

[solstag]

Ni! In the first comment:

a Data Provider that owns (or has sufficient rights from a data owner) to distribute data for unrestricted uses

Without the parenthesis reads:

a Data Provider that owns to distribute data for unrestricted uses

Which doesn't make sense.

I don't know if that is acceptable under legal writing, it is probably alright in a comment, but I find it awkward to read.

Why not simply:

... a Data Provider that owns data, or has sufficient rights from a data owner, to distribute data for unrestricted uses ...

.~´