IPC icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
IPC copied to clipboard

Change to code that doesn't use boost

Open neoarc opened this issue 4 years ago • 1 comments

I don't know if this is an unreasonable demand.

While reviewing the use of this IPC library, I was asked if boost was absolutely necessary.

At this point, most of them can be replaced by standards such as c++17.

The internal code is well written, but the usability is not the best.

How do you think?

neoarc avatar Sep 01 '20 09:09 neoarc

all of the shared memory stuff is boost::interprocess, I don't think that's in c++17

larsonmpdx avatar Oct 16 '20 19:10 larsonmpdx